My MyDoom Doom
Jan. 30th, 2004 06:05 amThis new virus, MyDoom is doing my head in. Not because my PC is infected, but because it seems everyone else in the world is. I'm getting an increasing amount of emails a day to my furry address, getting near 100 virus emails a day. I didn't realise that a) I'd be on that many people's personal address book and b) They'd be stupid enough to run the attachment. McAfee throws a flid every time I get one of these emails so now I find it easier to disable McAfee and delete them manually. Does anyone know of an effective way of filtering these messages off? My server has SpamAssassin so perhaps there's a way of configuring that to get rid of these emails?
Please let me know, I'm going mad!
Please let me know, I'm going mad!
Hmm...
Date: 2004-01-29 11:03 pm (UTC)The subject lines are usually things like 'Hi!' or reports from Mailer.Daemons... dunno if that helps though... I'm just gonna keep deleting the bastard things until I'm free...
no subject
Date: 2004-01-30 03:29 am (UTC)If you're still getting lots of spam, try setting the threshold at 5.0 and putting in a few extra rules in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf (or equivalent) that bung some more points on any addresses that are obsolete, deprecated, or given specifically to organisations likely to hand the address to spammers. For example, from our configuration:
header TO_NOSPAM_ADDR ToCc =~ /\+nospam\+/i
describe TO_NOSPAM_ADDR Recipient is a `nospam' address
score TO_NOSPAM_ADDR 2.0
header TO_DGW_ADDR ToCc =~ /dgw\.co\.uk/i
describe TO_DGW_ADDR Recipient is an old DGW address
score TO_DGW_ADDR 1.0
While you're at it, I'd also recommend adding "score HABEAS_SWE 2.0". Habeas SWE is a nice idea, but when I measured, the other day, fraudulent use of it was responsible for 90% of my misclassified e-mail, and we'd never received a legitimate message that used it.
Re:
Date: 2004-01-30 04:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-30 05:42 am (UTC)As I said, I set that to 5.0, which is actually pretty aggressive for a company-wide rather than individual setting. However, I tested it on about ten thousand e-mails — both spam and ham — beforehand: the false-negative and false-positive rates were most acceptable at around that point. The complaint rate is very low.
Some SpamAssassin rules
Date: 2004-01-30 10:05 am (UTC)http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/bogus-virus-warnings.cf (http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/bogus-virus-warnings.cf)
Although not going to help with the virus problem, it gets rid of those pesky virus warnings.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-30 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-30 10:43 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-01-31 02:37 am (UTC)Read more about it here: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_100983.htm
It's the biggest virus in the history of viruses!
Re:
Date: 2004-01-31 01:34 pm (UTC)