HD-DVD / Blu-Ray war over
Feb. 16th, 2008 04:32 pmLooks like Toshiba have finally bit the bullet and announced they are planning to withdraw from HD-DVD production (confirmed by Reuters) meaning effectively Blu-Ray has won. Now I had been holding out for a HD-DVD/Blu-Ray combo player, however now all I need to bother with is a Blu-Ray. The problem is for a standard format, there's three different versions or profiles, 1.0, 1.1 and 2.0 (BD-Live). The latter isn't in use yet but come Summer it will be so there's no point in getting a player that isn't future-proof.
No current Blu-Ray players support BD-Live but one of the requirements of it is that the player has an ethernet port for internet access. At present there is only one Blu-Ray player which has an ethernet port and is firmware upgradable to have BD-Live when it's available in the summer... the PS3. So, I'm presented with the choice of either getting a PS3 now, selling my soul to Sony but being able to enjoy HD film loveliness (Ratatouille!), or I wait until the summer when the BD-Live compatible players will be available.
Hmm...
No current Blu-Ray players support BD-Live but one of the requirements of it is that the player has an ethernet port for internet access. At present there is only one Blu-Ray player which has an ethernet port and is firmware upgradable to have BD-Live when it's available in the summer... the PS3. So, I'm presented with the choice of either getting a PS3 now, selling my soul to Sony but being able to enjoy HD film loveliness (Ratatouille!), or I wait until the summer when the BD-Live compatible players will be available.
Hmm...
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 04:42 pm (UTC)Buy something now if you want, but you then forfeit any and all rights to complain later if you find a cheaper, better option further down the line :P
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:29 pm (UTC)*polishes halo*
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:46 pm (UTC)Plus the files are frigging huge. True I can still download an 8gb movie in a day, I'd rather rent the film from Lovefilm or buy the HD disc.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 01:28 am (UTC)Then again, I might be wrong. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 01:29 am (UTC)If I needed to, I'd probably just give Hyzenthlay a DVI cable and let it play away, within its capabilities, but that has that side effect of tying up a lot of its processing time. ^_^ Otherwise, some kind of purpose built box, like an AppleTV (appropriately tweaked to add the Perian plugin, VLC, and MplayerOSX), or even a dedicated TV system - more expensive, but without any concerns about 1080 playback, let alone what codecs and containers. Or a PS3 in Linux, unless it's appropriately aware of MPEG twiddles like DivX out of the box. A PS3 would have the advantage of Blu-Ray, of course, and would be a pile of fun to code for at the low level.. oh, just feel that parallel goodness, multiple vector units linked with three communication rings.. but not much memory each, forcing a need to keep those memory pipelines flowing.
Mm, some of the 1080 rips have been fairly huge. Unsurprisingly, the 720 counterparts have tended to be greatly smaller, but at that resolution hit.
Meanwhile, ISPs continue to bicker over whether there's a need for more backbone bandwidth and FTTC/FTTH. Wow.. I wonder. Things like the iTunes Store's video offerings are still relatively new, but they're not exactly going to depress the demand for bandwidth, at a time when many of them are trying to clamp home users to a few tens of GB per month, despite a complete season of a show weighing in at 10-20GB.
£15b for complete UK fiber goodness, yet it's apparently a higher priority for HMG to continue to pour money into Iraq, and defeat investigations that might threaten the dignity of some powerful Saudi figures. Such odd priorities.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 10:52 am (UTC)As far as hardware goes, I'd need to get something like this: http://www.popcornhour.com/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 06:28 pm (UTC)i still haven't got around to buying all my videos on normal dvd yet.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 07:24 pm (UTC)I'm glad I backed Blu-Ray from the start, though I'm kinda annoyed I'm going to have to buy The Lion King again, too. Esp as I'm sure it's going to be the IMAX version again and not the true original. Unless the Blu-Ray has both versions on it (there's enough space), but I doubt it.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 12:59 am (UTC)http://www.ultimatedisney.com/thelionking2.html <- all the changes that irked me are listed here, a couple of them with screenshots comparing the old and the new.
As for The Morning Report. I liked it, thousands didn't. :) Thankfully, it was optional and you could watch the film without its inclusion if you wanted to.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 01:12 am (UTC)I certainly can't go along with the alligators, either - the original intent was to derive inspiration from African artwork, and they accomplished that melding of traditional themes with some degree of tooniness admirably to begin with.
Still, I suppose the livelihood of many editorial committees relied upon such needless tinkering..
I see I should investigate what original HD options exist. Such broadcasts are often captured, but actually locating them is a different matter; I've not really been active in that, as I can only play plain MPEG-4 at 720p, let alone anything at 1080, but a successor to my current system will arrive eventually. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:31 pm (UTC)I still won't be selling my laserdisc box set of The Lion King, though. =:D
no subject
Date: 2008-02-16 11:50 pm (UTC)I wish they had another standard!
Date: 2008-02-17 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-17 12:42 am (UTC)Plus it gives you time to save - instead of using the handy ol' credit card :)